Records management principles
A record is information created, received or maintained as evidence of an activity, decision or business transaction. Records may be in paper or electronic form and can include documents, images, emails, databases, audio recordings and other information assets.
Records management is the systematic control of records throughout their lifecycle, from creation or receipt through to retention and authorised disposal. Effective records management helps ensure information remains accurate, secure, accessible and reliable.
RTOs should store records securely and protect them from unauthorised access, loss, damage or destruction. Records may be retained in hard copy, electronic format or both, provided they remain accessible for the required retention period and can be retrieved for the Training Accreditation Council’s (TAC) audit purposes. Student information should not be disclosed to a third party without the student's consent, unless authorised or required by law. Records management procedures should also ensure students can access their own records when requested. Table 1 below provides a checklist of what an RTO should consider when establishing a records management system.
Table 1. Checklist for establishing a records management system
| Records management consideration | Questions to address |
|---|---|
| Identification | What records need to be kept? |
| Retention | How long must records be kept? |
| Storage | How will records be stored and protected? |
| Access | Who is authorised to access records? |
| Responsibility | Who is responsible for managing records? |
| Disposal | When and how will records be disposed of? |
| Monitoring | How will the system be reviewed and monitored? |
RTOs can support effective record keeping by developing and maintaining a Records Management Plan that outlines how records will be created, managed, protected, retained and disposed of. The State Records Office of Western Australia provides resources and templates that may assist organisations in developing records management processes and plans.
Legislative and regulatory frameworks
Depending on legal status and operations, RTOs may have obligations under Commonwealth or State privacy, freedom of information and records legislation. RTOs should identify the legislation that applies to their organisation, their operations, and the jurisdictions in which they operate.
Relevant legislation may include the Commonwealth Privacy Act 1988, applicable State or Territory privacy and freedom of information legislation, and records legislation applying to public sector organisations. In WA, the public sector may also have obligations under the WA Privacy and Responsible Information Sharing Act 2024.
Like many organisations, RTOs have record keeping obligations enforced by additional legislation and regulations. The nature of those obligations is dependent on many factors including:
- the industry area in which the RTO operates;
- whether it is a public or private organisation;
- whether the RTO is a ‘for profit’ or ‘not for profit’ organisation; and
- an RTO’s client group.
Generally, each RTO will need to consider this hierarchy to establish their obligations:
- Legislation
- Regulation
- Regulatory body guidelines and instructions
- Funding body or contractual requirements
- RTO’s own policy and procedure requirements.
For each level of obligation, the RTO will need to consider:
- What is relevant to my RTO?
- What specific records is my RTO required to keep?
An RTO’s policies and procedures should identify what additional records are created and managed to satisfy record keeping obligations.
Retention and record-keeping obligations
Retention periods at a glance
The retention guidance referred to in this Fact Sheet summarised below. Legislation or funding contracts may require some records to be kept for longer. Table 2 summarises key requirements under the Compliance Standards and Outcome Standards that expressly require records to be created or that are particularly relevant to records management.
Table 2. Key records retention requirements
| Record | Minimum retention | Source |
|---|---|---|
| AQF certification documentation issued to VET students | 30 years | Compliance Requirement 10(b) |
| All assessments submitted by a VET student to the RTO or a third party | 2 years after the student completes the training product | Compliance Requirement 10(c) |
| Records needed to support an assessment appeal | Until the RTO's appeal period ends, if this is later than the 2 years above | RTO's appeals policy/process Outcome Standard 2.8 |
| Records required under a funding contract | As specified in the contract | Funding body |
| Other records that may be viewed at audit | At least 7 years (recommended) | TAC recommendation (see RTO Records for Audit) |
Key obligations under the Registration Standards 2025
As a condition of registration, RTOs must cooperate with the TAC to the extent necessary for TAC to perform its functions (Regulation 13(2)(f) of the Vocational Education and Training (General) Regulations 2009. RTOs must also operate in accordance with the Registration Standards 2025 (2025 Standards). Having effective systems for retaining, archiving, retrieving and transferring records assist RTOs to meet both obligations.
RTOs should also refer the RTO Reporting Requirements page on the TAC website for further information about retention and reporting of data.
The 2025 Standards are outcomes-focused. While a small number of requirements specifically require RTOs to create or retain particular records (listed in Table 3), most outcomes do not prescribe what records must be kept. Instead, each RTO determines the records it needs to create and retain to demonstrate achievement of the relevant outcomes. Examples of records that may support this are provided in Table 4.
Table 3: Records components of the Compliance Requirements and Outcome Standards
| Compliance Requirement 10 – Records of AQF certification documentation and assessments | |
|---|---|
| 10(a) | Maintain a register of the Australian Qualification Framework (AQF) qualifications the RTO is authorised to issue, and of all AQF qualifications and VET statements of attainment issued to VET students. |
| 10(b) | Retain records of all AQF certification documentation issued to VET students for 30 years. |
| 10(c) | Retain records of all assessments submitted by a VET student to the RTO or a third party for 2 years after the student completes the training product. |
| 10(d) | Ensure VET students, including former students, can access copies of their AQF certification documentation. |
| 10(e) | Provide the Council, on request, with a report of all AQF qualifications and VET statements of attainment issued in a specified period. |
| Compliance Requirement 12 – Student identifier requirements | |
| (1) | Qualifications and Statements of Attainment (SoAs) must not include a Unique Student Identifier (USI). |
| (2) | An RTO must not issue a qualification or SoA without a USI. |
| (3) | Exceptions apply where a) the provider is exempt from reporting to the national VET provider collection under Section 5 of the VET Data Policy; or b) the student is not an Australian citizen or visa holder and completed training outside Australia, or completed training before 1 January 2015. |
| (4) | Students must be advised before enrolment or commencement that their results will not be included in the national VET provider collection and/or will not appear on an authenticated VET transcript issued by the Student Identifiers Registrar. |
| (5) | The USI requirements in points 2 and 3 do not apply to providers that are not constitutional corporations. |
| Compliance Requirement 17 – Third Party Arrangements | |
| 17 | Have a written agreement for each third-party arrangement and notify the TAC of it. |
| Compliance Requirement 20 – Compliance with Laws | |
| 20 | Must comply with all applicable Commonwealth and State laws. |
| Outcome Standards | |
| 1.6 | Document decisions relating to recognition of prior learning. |
| 1.7 | Document decisions relating to credit transfer. |
| 1.8 | Document strategies and procedures to identify and manage risks to VET students in work-integrated learning, work placements or other community-based learning. |
| 2.7 | Document the outcomes of complaints and communicate them to all parties. |
| 2.8 | Document the outcomes of appeals and communicate them to the appellant. |
| 4.2 | Document the roles and responsibilities of persons engaged by the RTO/third party arrangements. |
Specific record retention considerations
Assessment Validation
The assessment records retained under Compliance Requirement 10 (see Retention of Student Assessments) also support validation. To show how each judgement was made, records should include both the student's evidence and the assessor's record of the decision. Depending on the assessment method, this may include submitted assessments, photos or videos, observation records, completed marking guides, workplace evidence, workplace supervisor or third-party reports, records of reasonable adjustments and feedback provided to the student. RTOs must retain records of all assessments submitted by a VET student for two years after the student completes the training product.
Outcome Standard 1.5 requires RTOs to use a risk-based approach to decide which parts of the assessment system to validate and the sample size. RTOs should keep records of how these decisions were made, who undertook the validation and their credentials, what was found, and what changes were made as a result.
Appeals
RTOs should retain sufficient records including evidence of assessment decisions, for the duration of the RTO’s appeals period, including extending beyond the minimum two-year retention period when required to support the investigation and resolution of complaints or appeals. Retaining assessment evidence may also assist validation activities, internal quality assurance processes, and audits conducted by TAC, funding bodies or other regulators.
Records for audit
RTOs are required to participate in audit processes and will need to provide records that demonstrate they are complying with the 2025 Standards. Where records are stored off site, arrangements should be made in advance to ensure auditors can access them during the audit process.
As a guide, TAC recommends that documents (other than those listed in Table 3) which may be requested during an audit, are retained for at least seven years, unless a longer retention period applies under legislation or other regulatory requirements. These documents may include the following:
- Training and assessment records such as attendance records, assessment records, training record books, RPL and credit transfer decisions and assessment validation records.
- Training delivery and governance records, including training and assessment strategies, policies and procedures, student handbooks, and records of continuous improvement activities.
- Student and stakeholder engagement records, including complaints, appeals, student surveys, feedback and actions arising from feedback.
- Quality assurance and compliance records, including audit reports, corrective actions, validation records and evidence of compliance activities.
- Data and reporting records, including data for the National VET Provider Collection (AVETMISS), Quality Indicator data collected under the Data Provisions Requirements and VET Data Policy, reports submitted to TAC, and any actions arising from the analysis of this data.
- Where public funding has been received, financial and funding records, including records relating to funding agreements, enrolments, assessment delivery and expenditure.
- Marketing and promotional materials used to inform prospective students and other stakeholders.
Managing records following RTO closure
Section 6 of the national VET Data Policy requires RTOs to submit up-to-date data for the National VET Provider Collection (AVETMISS) for the time up to the date its registration ceases, and must notify the TAC that this has occurred.
In addition, Regulation 27 of the of the Vocational Education and Training (General) Regulations 2009 requires an RTO provide the TAC with student records within 28 days of a cancellation decision taking effect.
Records that support compliance
A useful test for any record is whether it serves a clear purpose in supporting the RTO’s operations, decision making, student outcomes or continuous improvement. Records should demonstrate what happened, why decisions were made, and how the RTO meets its legal, regulatory or contractual obligations. Table 4 provides examples of records that may help demonstrate compliance with the 2025 Standards.
Table 4: Examples of records that may support compliance
| Compliance/Outcome to demonstrate | Records worth keeping | Why it matters | Less useful |
|---|---|---|---|
| Certification is issued correctly (Compliance Requirement 9, 10 and 12) |
| Shows certification was issued only to students assessed as competent, within 30 days, and with a verified student identifier. | A list of names without dates or verification. |
| Assessment judgements are valid and justified (Outcome Standard 1.4; Compliance Requirement 10) |
| Supports the judgement if it is appealed, validated or audited, or if a qualification is questioned. | Checklists with ticks only and no record of what was observed. |
| Assessment tools are fit for purpose before use (Outcome Standard 1.3) |
| Shows problems were identified before students were assessed. | A sign-off saying 'reviewed' with no findings. |
| The assessment system is quality assured (Outcome Standard 1.5) |
| Shows validation is risk-based and leads to improvement. | Meeting notes stating 'validated, no issues'. |
| RPL and credit transfer decisions are fair and consistent (Outcome Standard 1.6, 1.7) |
| These decisions must be documented, and the records show they were consistent and maintained the integrity of the training product. | Application forms marked 'granted' with no evidence. |
| Students are advised about suitability before enrolment (Outcome Standard 2.2) |
| Shows the student was told whether the training product suited them. | Test scores filed with no record of the advice given. |
| Reasonable adjustments are fair and maintain the standard (Outcome Standard 2.4; 1.4) |
| Shows fairness to the student and that training product requirements were still met. | A disability disclosure form on its own. |
| Work placements are safe and suitable (Outcome Standard 1.8) |
| Shows students were protected while learning in the workplace. | A generic WHS policy not linked to placements. |
| Complaints and appeals are resolved fairly (Outcome Standard 2.7, 2.8) |
| Shows procedural fairness and that feedback informs continuous improvement. | Correspondence with no recorded outcome. |
| Trainers and assessors are credentialled and current (Outcome Standard 3.2, 3.3) |
| Shows students are trained and assessed by appropriately qualified, current people. | Generic professional development certificates unrelated to the products delivered. |
| Third parties deliver to the Standards (Compliance Requirement 17; Outcome Standard 4.2) |
| The RTO remains accountable for services delivered on its behalf. | An agreement with no evidence of monitoring. |
| Governance and risk are managed (Outcome Standard 4.1, 4.3) |
| Shows governing persons are informed and acting on risks. | Policies with no evidence they are applied. |
| Improvement is systematic (Outcome Standard 4.4) |
| Shows the improvement cycle is completed. | Survey responses collected but never analysed. |