The fund's aim is to deliver environmental offsets in the Pilbara through a strategic landscape-scale approach, building on regional programs including ranger groups, so that environmental offset outcomes are greater than the sum of individual offset contributions.
Environmental offsets are actions that provide environmental benefits which counterbalance the significant residual environmental impacts or risks of a project or activity that remain after mitigation (including rehabilitation). Offsets are usually undertaken outside of the mining activity area.
The fund combines money from individual offset payments required under Part IV of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act), and may combine contributions required under Part 9 or 10 of the Commonwealth Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999 (EPBC Act).
The fund’s establishment enables the government to combine offset money and partner with regional land management organisations, to deliver projects that achieve better and more connected biodiversity conservation outcomes.
It will operate for decades to come with project rounds running every 1 to 2 years in focused areas to improve and restore vegetation and habitat over the longer term, further information is available in the overview.
The Pilbara bioregion
The Pilbara region has ancient and striking landscapes and many diverse habitats, including mangroves, grassland savannahs, mountain ranges, gorges, wetlands and tropical woodlands.
The region has very high biodiversity value, possessing high species richness and many endemic flora and fauna species. It has 150 conservation-significant flora species and the greatest reptile diversity in Western Australia. It is also an international hotspot for subterranean fauna.
The Pilbara is also one of Australia’s most important regions for mineral wealth, and generates 40 per cent of Western Australia’s gross domestic product. While industry is vital to our economic progress, its impacts need to be balanced with the conservation of the region’s precious environmental values.
Why a fund for the Pilbara?
Environmental offsets have helped mining companies and other proponents meet their obligations under state and federal legislation in the Pilbara for many years.
They enable sustainable mining development by counterbalancing impacts that can’t be avoided or mitigated. Offset activities are undertaken outside a specific project area rather than onsite.
To date, the effective implementation of offsets in the Pilbara has been hampered by the region’s unique land tenure (all crown land with overlapping mining, native title and pastoral interests). This makes traditional land acquisition and access for on-ground offset activities difficult. Offsets have not always been connected with other conservation efforts or deployed where needed most.
In 2012, the Western Australian Minister for Environment mandated that proponents in the Pilbara pay their environmental offsets into a strategic fund for conservation. In the same year, the federal Minister for Environment gave proponents the option of doing so. This led to the establishment of the Pilbara Environmental Offsets Fund.
The approach was supported by strategic advice from the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) to the state Minister for Environment in 2014, which identified key threats and challenges to the conservation of biodiversity in the region: EPA’s 16(E) Cumulative environmental impacts of development in the Pilbara region advice.
The Pilbara Environmental Offset Fund enables government, in partnership with traditional owners and regional stakeholders, to broker access for offsets on land with complicated tenure arrangements, and in doing so deliver projects that:
- are strategic, linked and delivered across the landscape
- leverage other regional programs and build on existing partnerships between traditional owners, conservation agencies, industry and government, and engage traditional owners and rangers in work on their country.
The fund’s implementation plan describes how the fund will be delivered over the next five years.
Under the EP Act, the EPA undertakes the environmental impact assessment (EIA) process for significant development projects proposed for Western Australia.
Under the EIA process, companies undertaking mining and infrastructure projects in the Pilbara bioregion may be required to pay a rate per hectare of impact that they cannot avoid or rehabilitate. This money is then combined into the Pilbara Environmental Offset Fund’s special purpose account.
The conditions for implementing these offsets are set out in Ministerial Approval Statements which are published on the EPA website
Rates paid for the offset
Implementation conditions in Ministerial Statements set out the rate per hectare. Rates have been set in three of the four sub-regions in the Pilbara bioregion (Chichester, Fortescue, and Hamersley) that proponents must pay. So far, rates have been set for the Chichester, Fortescue and Hamersley but not for Roebourne.
These rates are based on the level of biodiversity protection in the region, and cumulative impacts to environmental values, including high quality vegetation and the conservation of significant-species habitat.
A base rate applies for impacts to native vegetation in good to excellent condition, which may include impacts to fauna habitat.
A higher rate may apply for impacts to some types of specialised environmental values, including but not limited to impacts on:
- riparian vegetation
- Threatened or Priority Ecological Communities
- important vegetation types
- specialised fauna habitat.
A negotiated rate, or alternative approach, will be determined on a case-by-case basis for impacts to particularly significant or sensitive environmental values that do not suit a standardised value.
The rate per hectare will be subject to annual indexation to the Perth – All Groups Consumer Price Index.
|Financial Year||Hamersley: base||Hamersley: higher||Fortescue: base||Fortescue: higher||Chichester: base||Chichester: higher|
Australian Government conditions
If memorandum of understanding is signed between the state and federal governments, the fund can also receive money required as a condition under Part 9 or 10 of the EPBC Act (Cth). Where state and federal offset values overlap, government agencies work cooperatively to align offsets and avoid duplication to the fullest extent practicable.
The EPBC Act Environmental Offsets Policy guides the use of offsets under federal legislation.
The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation is responsible for managing $90 million worth of offset contributions over the next 40 years. This will ensure that offset payments directly benefit vegetation and habitat impacted by mining.
Each of the government, mining and community sectors expect good governance and all have helped develop the fund’s governance framework.
Traditional owners, industry, government, natural resource management organisations, conservation groups and the research sector have advised government on the development and evaluation of the five-year implementation plan, which defines the priorities and criteria for project selection.
The governance framework and terms of reference establish transparent decision-making processes, clarify roles and responsibilities, and guide the delivery of projects with the monies receipted to the fund.
The Minister for Environment has endorsed five core principles which frame delivery of the fund, which are:
- Transparent and accountable fund administration
- Cost-efficiency, including maximising leveraging opportunities to achieve regional environmental outcomes and minimising administration
- Effective performance evaluation and continual improvement
- Clear roles, responsibilities and accountabilities
- Constructive and transparent engagement with key stakeholders
Roles and responsibilities
Minister for Environment
The Minister is the fund’s key decision-maker. He or she decides which projects get funded based on the criteria set in the plan.
The Department of Water and Environmental Regulation (the department) manages the fund given its role in assuring compliance with the Financial Management Act 1997, Part IV of the EP Act (Ministerial Conditions), the WA Offsets Policy and conditions of the special purpose account. The department also chairs and provides the secretariat for the IAG and PRG.
The department and the Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions (DBCA) jointly advise the Minister, including putting forward the recommendations of the IAG and PRG.
Implementation advisory group (IAG)
The IAG is a group of experts associated with rehabilitation and conservation projects in the Pilbara, representing:
- the mining industry
- state government agencies
- non-government land management and conservation organisations
- traditional owners
- Western Australian Biodiversity Science Institute
The IAG provides advice to the Directors General of this department and DCBA, and the Minister for Environment on:
- strategies, plans, reports and projects that exist to conserve biodiversity in the Pilbara
- leveraging opportunities
- the five-year implementation plan
- the scope of each project round
- the fund’s monitoring, evaluation, reporting and improvement framework
The IAG meets quarterly, although a special meeting may be convened by the Chair at any time. The IAG meeting schedule, agenda and minutes can be found on the implementation advisory group page.
IAG members include:
|Jan Cowan||Pilbara Aboriginal Voice||Pilbara Aboriginal Voice member|
|TBC||Pilbara Aboriginal Voice||Pilbara Aboriginal Voice member|
|Patrick Seares – Chair||Department of Water and Environmental Regulation||Executive Director Strategy and Engagement|
|TBC||Department of Biodiversity Conservation and Attractions||Assistant Director, Science Biodiversity and Conservation Science|
|Blair Parsons||Greening Australia||Science and Programs Leader – Western Region|
|Jo Williams||Pilbara Mesquite Management Committee||Project Manager|
|Harriet Davies||Specialist Biological Sciences, Roy Hill||AMEC Representative|
|Karin Bankin||Rio Tinto||CME Representative|
|Lesley Gibson||Western Australian Biodiversity Science Institute|
Project recommendation group (PRG)
The PRG consists of representatives from this department, DBCA and the federal Department of the Environment and Energy (DoEE), all of whom have experience in the deployment of biodiversity conservation projects.
An independent probity officer attends PRG meetings to ensure that project recommendation decisions are made in accordance with the implementation plan.
The PRG reviews project applications and recommends to the Minister which projects should be invested in.
Delivery Agents will deliver projects selected by the Minister.
They may be drawn from the not-for-profit, government or private sectors through partnerships, direct requests or a call for expressions of interest.
Delivering the fund
Project implementation principles
State and federal offset policies define principles to guide the implementation of environmental offsets.
Key offset policy principles for implementation of the fund are:
|Relevant and proportional||
|Strategic and landscape scale||
|Enduring and secure in the longer term||
|Additional to existing legislative obligations||
Priority areas for investment
The fund will target investment in areas with a high density of both state and federal environmental matters, and where land tenure provides an opportunity for legal access and longevity for offset outcomes.
Projects will be delivered at different scales:
- Landscape-scale programs address threats like weeds, feral animals, and inappropriate fire across the landscape.
- Priority area programs build on the landscape-scale outcomes to further improve and protect vegetation and species habitat in identified priority areas.
- Site-specific projects protect and improve specific environmental matters such as Priority Ecological Communities or a particular habitat with unique attributes.
Three priority areas for the first five years have been identified and are the starting point for the fund. Priority areas include:
- Area 1: Chichester sub-bioregion – area south of Port Hedland centred on the Great Northern Highway
- Area 2: Hamersley sub-region – area to the far east of the sub-region abutting the North West Coastal Highway
- Area 3: Fortescue sub-bioregion – the mid Fortescue Valley. Include map of the 3 priority areas.
The priority areas included in each project round will depend on the money available in the fund, and where projects that achieve long term outcomes for offset, are most feasible.